Comparison guide

Gigabyte M28U vs LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B: which should you choose?

Gigabyte M28U and LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B compared under one framework. Decision axes: resolution and text clarity, panel quality, refresh rate, color accuracy, brightness, and connectivity. Includes price context and category-specific tradeoffs.

Published: 2026-08-16 · Updated: 2026-08-16

Gigabyte M28U and LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B product comparison image
Gigabyte M28U and LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B product comparison image

Monitors verdict

Upgrade for specific needs. The products share a category but prioritize different strengths. The figures below use the same weighting model and stored representative configurations; confirm the configuration and price on the merchant page before buying.

  • Gigabyte M28U: A 28-inch 4K 144Hz with built-in KVM — value for a multi-setup that moves between console and PC on one screen.
  • LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B: A 45-inch ultrawide OLED 240Hz — an 800R curve fills your view for gaming immersion.
  • Upgrade recommendation: 54 / 100
  • Data completeness: 100%

Choosing between Gigabyte M28U and LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B starts with the real use case and the problem to solve, not with which product is newer. Use context: the longest screen task across documents, photo or video editing, PC gaming, and consoles. Decision axes: resolution and text clarity, panel quality, refresh rate, color accuracy, brightness, and connectivity. This guide applies one calculation model to stored representative configurations while keeping the category-specific decision order visible.

Core specifications on one baseline

Gigabyte M28U and LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B core specification comparison
ItemGigabyte M28ULG UltraGear 45GR95QE-BDelta
Resolution92 score80 score-13%
Panel quality84 score96 score+14.3%
Refresh rate86 score96 score+11.6%
Color gamut84 score92 score+9.5%
Brightness60 score60 scoreSame
Connectivity86 score78 score-9.3%
Value86 score76 score-11.6%
Screen size28 in44.5 in+58.9%
refresh_hz144 Hz240 Hz+66.7%
peak_nits300 nits800 nits+166.7%
response_ms1 ms0.03 ms-97%
dci_p3_pct94 %98.5 %+4.8%
ChipsetIPS panelWOLED panelDifferent
ColorBlackBlackSame
Connectivity2x HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, USB-C 18W, KVM, USB hub2x HDMI 2.1, DP 1.4, USB 3.0 hubDifferent
HDRVESA DisplayHDR 400VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400Different
LineupAORUSUltraGearDifferent
Panel typeIPSWOLED 800R curvedDifferent
RegionGLOBALGLOBALSame
Resolution3840x2160 (4K UHD)3440x1440 (UWQHD)Different

Resolution

The resolution score is 92.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 80.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. Gigabyte M28U leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining pixel density and text or workspace clarity at the given size on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Panel quality

The panel quality score is 84.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 96.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining contrast, viewing angles, response behavior, burn-in, and persistence risk on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Refresh rate

The refresh rate score is 86.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 96.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining motion clarity and input latency in games and scrolling on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Color gamut

The color gamut score is 84.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 92.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining color coverage and calibration suitability for photo and video work on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Brightness

The brightness score is 60.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 60.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. The two products are level here. It is a relative index combining bright-room readability, SDR headroom, and HDR highlights on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Connectivity

The connectivity score is 86.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 78.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. Gigabyte M28U leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining single-cable laptops, power delivery, KVM use, and console compatibility on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Value

The value score is 86.0 for Gigabyte M28U and 76.0 for LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B. Gigabyte M28U leads this dimension. It is a relative index combining panel, resolution, ports, and warranty relative to the current price on one baseline. Read the underlying specification rows, source completeness, and exact selling configuration before treating the lead as decisive. Similar averages can hide different weak points, so a small point gap matters less than whether the product removes a concrete problem under your normal usage conditions.

Who should choose Gigabyte M28U

Gigabyte M28U is the stronger fit when its leading dimensions match your primary use. Configuration checks: screen size, resolution, panel, refresh rate, brightness, color gamut, inputs, and power delivery. Then ask whether the product removes a concrete problem with the device you already own. If the gap is small and there is no real pain point, waiting for a price drop or a change in workload can be more rational than upgrading for novelty alone.

Who should choose LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B

LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B is the better fit when more of its strengths overlap your priorities and its weaker dimensions remain acceptable. Switching costs: monitor arm and desk space, cables and docks, KVM setup, warranty, and burn-in policy. A higher total can still deliver lower practical value when that burden is large, so compare the score lead and switching cost on the same baseline.

How to read price and purchase availability

Neither product currently has an approved purchase link whose product name and configuration match the catalog, so no merchant link is shown. AsKrs does not guess a destination; this guide provides specifications and decision criteria until an exact listing is verified.

  • Gigabyte M28U · No verified purchase link currently available
  • LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B · No verified purchase link currently available

Final decision checklist

  1. Use context: the longest screen task across documents, photo or video editing, PC gaming, and consoles.
  2. Configuration checks: screen size, resolution, panel, refresh rate, brightness, color gamut, inputs, and power delivery.
  3. Switching costs: monitor arm and desk space, cables and docks, KVM setup, warranty, and burn-in policy.
  4. When the score gap is small, identify the concrete problem the change will solve.
  5. Recheck the seller, delivery, return terms, condition, and current price at checkout.

Scope and limits of this comparison

This comparison is a structured decision aid built from published specifications and stored representative configurations. Scope and limits: panel variance, OLED burn-in risk, real HDR brightness, desk distance, and operating-system scaling. The scores are relative indicators for setting priorities within one category, not an absolute quality ranking. When a new configuration or verified specification becomes available, the catalog and its comparison pages are regenerated together.

Open the full configuration-level comparison and upgrade score

Related comparison guides